Preoperative Evaluation and Postoperative Complications in Liver Transplantation
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Review
VOLUME: 14 ISSUE: 1
P: 144 - 156
April 2026

Preoperative Evaluation and Postoperative Complications in Liver Transplantation

Turk Radiol Semin 2026;14(1):144-156
1. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Malatya, Türkiye
2. Özel Radyoloji Kliniği, Malatya, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 17.03.2026
Accepted Date: 20.04.2026
Online Date: 27.04.2026
Publish Date: 27.04.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Liver transplantation is a curative treatment option for patients with liver failure, diffuse liver disease, and early-stage primary liver malignancies. Transplantation operations are increasingly performed worldwide and in our country. In living-donor liver transplantation, donor candidates undergo comprehensive densitometric and volumetric analyses to assess the qualitative and quantitative suitability of their livers for both themselves and recipients, as well as vascular and cholangiographic examinations to determine their suitability for surgical techniques. With recent advances in imaging techniques, these procedures enable the virtual determination of the appropriate surgical resection technique. Notwithstanding significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative patient care in recent years, significant complications can still be detected in patients after transplantation. These complications can be early-stage or late-stage after liver transplantation. While ultrasonography is often used as the initial step in pre- and post-transplant evaluation, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging play a crucial role in identifying and monitoring complications. This review will briefly describe the workflow and decision-making processes used in the evaluation donor candidates and demonstrate radiological findings of complications after transplantation.

Keywords:
Liver transplantation, preoperative imaging in liver transplantation, imaging in postoperative complications

References

1
Brettschneider L, Daloze PM, Huguet C, Groth CG, Kashiwagi N, Hutchison DE, et al. Successful orthotopic transplantation of liver homografts after eight to twenty-five hours preservation. Surg Forum. 1967; 18: 376-8.
2
Han A, Byra M, Heba E, Andre MP, Erdman JW Jr, Loomba R, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and quantification of liver fat with radiofrequency ultrasound data using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. Radiology. 2020; 295: 342-50.
3
Sagir Kahraman A, Karakas HM, Kirimlioglu H, Kahraman B, Yilmaz S, Kirimlioglu V. The assessment of hepatosteatosis in living-donor liver transplant: comparison of liver attenuation index and histopathologic results. Exp Clin Transplant. 2017; 15: 69-77.
4
Marcos A. Right lobe living donor liver transplantation: a review. Liver Transpl. 2000; 6: 3-20.
5
Putta T, John RA, Eapen A, Chandramohan A, Simon B, Rymbai ML, et al. Computed tomography evaluation of the arterial supply to segment 4 of the liver. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2018; 8: 31.
6
Michels NA. Newer anatomy of the liver and its vari- ant blood supply and collateral circulation. Am J Surg. 1966; 112: 337-47.
7
Hiatt JR, Gabbay J, Busuttil RW. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1000 cases. Ann Surg. 1994; 220: 50-2.
8
Cahalane AM, Mojtahed A, Sahani DV, Elias N, Kambadakone AR. Pre-hepatic and pre-pancreatic transplant donor evaluation. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019; 9(Suppl 1): S97-115.
9
Cheng YF, Huang TL, Lee TY, Chen TY, Chen CL. Variation of the intrahepatic portal vein; angiographic demonstration and application in living-related hepatic transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 1667-8.
10
Uchida K, Taniguchi M, Shimamura T, Suzuki T, Yamashita K, Ota M, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography scan analysis of hepatic vasculatures in the donor liver for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2010; 16: 1062-8.
11
Nadalin S, Bockhorn M, Malagó M, Valentin-Gamazo C, Frilling A, Broelsch CE. Living donor liver transplantation. HPB (Oxford). 2006; 8: 10-21.
12
Kim SY, Byun JH, Lee SS, Park SH, Jang YJ, Lee MG. Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: intraindividual comparison of MR cholangiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T. Radiology. 2010; 254: 469-78.
13
Huang TL, Cheng YF, Chen CL, Chen TY, Lee TY. Variants of the bile ducts: clinical application in the potential donor of living-related hepatic transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 1669-70.
14
Lang P, Schnarkowski P, Grampp S, van Dijke C, Gindele A, Steffen R, et al. Liver transplantation: significance of the periportal collar on MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995; 19: 580-5.
15
Bowen A, Hungate RG, Kaye RD, Reyes J, Towbin RB. Imaging in liver transplantation. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996; 34: 757-78.
16
Duran C, Aydinli B, Tokat Y, Yuzer Y, Kantarci M, Akgun M, et al. Stereological evaluation of liver volume in living donor liver transplantation using MDCT via the Cavalieri method. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13: 693-8.
17
Pickhardt PJ, Siegel MJ. Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder of the abdomen: CT evaluation in 51 patients. Radiology. 1999; 213: 73-8.