Abstract
Primary neoplasms that develop within the soft tissue parts of the retroperitoneum are relatively rare, but they are generally malignant and may progress to a significant size at the time of diagnosis. Although imaging findings are not specific, some characteristic features may play an important role in radiological detection, diagnosis, staging and preoperative evaluation of the tumor. The origin, location and size (e.g., presacral or paravertebral regions), tissue composition (fat content, fibrous tissue, cystic structures, etc.), signal characteristics on magnetic resonance imaging, vascularity, relationship with adjacent structures and extent of invasion of the tumor can all be evaluated radiologically. Identifying the macroscopic and microscopic histological features of the tumor may also facilitate correct diagnosis. Primary solid retroperitoneal tumors can be classified according to their origin and the soft tissue elements they contain, by imaging findings. Furthermore, imaging findings can be utilized to distinguish benign from malignant tumors and decide the best treatment strategy.
Keywords: Retroperitoneum, sarcoma, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging
References
Sassa N. Retroperitoneal tumors: review of diagnosis and management.Int J Urol. 2020; 27: 1058-70.
Rajiah P, Sinha R, Cuevas C, Dubinsky TJ, Bush WH Jr, Kolokythas O. Imaging of uncommon retroperitoneal masses.Radiographics. 2011; 31: 949-76.
Gupta A, Manchanda A, Singh S, Singh R, Khurana N, Durgad AS. Primary retroperitoneal masses: a pictorial essay.J Gastrointestinal Abdominal Radiol. 2023; 7: 65-72.
Tirkes T, Sandrasegaran K, Patel AA, Hollar MA, Tejada JG, Tann M, et al. Peritoneal and retroperitoneal anatomy and its relevance for cross-sectional imaging.Radiographics. 2012; 32: 437-51. Erratum in: Radiographics. 2019; 39: 912.
Goenka AH, Shah SN, Remer EM. Imaging of the retroperitoneum.Radiol Clin North Am. 2012; 50: 333-55, vii.
Al-Dasuqi K, Irshaid L, Mathur M. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of primary retroperitoneal neoplasms.Radiographics. 2020; 40: 1631-57.
Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Minami M, Yamamoto A, Ueda H, Takasu K. Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT and MR imaging findings with anatomic and pathologic diagnostic clues.Radiographics. 2003; 23: 45-57. Erratum in: Radiographics. 2003; 23: 1340.
Shaaban AM, Rezvani M, Tubay M, Elsayes KM, Woodward PJ, Menias CO. Fat-containing retroperitoneal lesions: ımaging characteristics, localization, and differential diagnosis.Radiographics. 2016; 36: 710-34.
Porrello G, Cannella R, Randazzo A, Badalamenti G, Brancatelli G, Vernuccio F. CT and MR imaging of retroperitoneal sarcomas: a practical guide for the radiologist.Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15: 2985.
Brennan MF, Antonescu CR, Moraco N, Singer S. Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma.Ann Surg. 2014; 260: 416-21; discussion 421-2.
Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Fanburg-Smith J. From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of musculoskeletal liposarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation.Radiographics. 2005; 25: 1371-95.
Gupta P, Potti TA, Wuertzer SD, Lenchik L, Pacholke DA. Spectrum of fat-containing soft-tissue masses at mr imaging: the common, the uncommon, the characteristic, and the sometimes confusing.Radiographics. 2016; 36: 753-66.
O’Regan KN, Jagannathan J, Krajewski K, Zukotynski K, Souza F, Wagner AJ, et al. Imaging of liposarcoma: classification, patterns of tumor recurrence, and response to treatment.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197: W37-43.
Levy AD, Manning MA, Al-Refaie WB, Miettinen MM. Soft-tissue sarcomas of the abdomen and pelvis: radiologic-pathologic features, part 1-common sarcomas: from the radiologic pathology archives.Radiographics. 2017; 37: 462-83.
Scali EP, Chandler TM, Heffernan EJ, Coyle J, Harris AC, Chang SD. Primary retroperitoneal masses: what is the differential diagnosis?Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40: 1887-903.
Craig WD, Fanburg-Smith JC, Henry LR, Guerrero R, Barton JH. Fat-containing lesions of the retroperitoneum: radiologic-pathologic correlation.Radiographics. 2009; 29: 261-90.
Brennan C, Kajal D, Khalili K, Ghai S. Solid malignant retroperitoneal masses-a pictorial review.Insights Imaging. 2014; 5: 53-65.
Fasih N, Prasad Shanbhogue AK, Macdonald DB, Fraser-Hill MA, Papadatos D, Kielar AZ, et al. Leiomyomas beyond the uterus: unusual locations, rare manifestations.Radiographics. 2008; 28: 1931-48.
Shanbhogue AK, Fasih N, Macdonald DB, Sheikh AM, Menias CO, Prasad SR. Uncommon primary pelvic retroperitoneal masses in adults: a pattern-based imaging approach.Radiographics. 2012; 32: 795-817.
Marko J, Wolfman DJ. Retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma from the radiologic pathology archives.Radiographics. 2018; 38: 1403-20.
Keraliya AR, Tirumani SH, Shinagare AB, Zaheer A, Ramaiya NH. Solitary fibrous tumors: 2016 imaging update.Radiol Clin North Am. 2016; 54: 565-79.
Kaya M, Wada T, Nagoya S, Sasaki M, Matsumura T, Yamaguchi T, et al. MRI and histological evaluation of the infiltrative growth pattern of myxofibrosarcoma.Skeletal Radiol. 2008; 37: 1085-90.
Petscavage-Thomas JM, Walker EA, Logie CI, Clarke LE, Duryea DM, Murphey MD. Soft-tissue myxomatous lesions: review of salient imaging features with pathologic comparison.Radiographics. 2014; 34: 964-80.
Hoarau N, Slim K, Da Ines D. CT and MR imaging of retroperitoneal Schwannoma.Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013; 94: 1133-9.
Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, Chun HJ, Lee HG, Lee JM. Neurogenic tumors in the abdomen: tumor types and imaging characteristics.Radiographics. 2003; 23: 29-43.
