Acute Coronary Syndrome
PDF

Review

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Turk Radiol Semin 2025;13(2):254-267 DOI: 10.4274/trs.2024.24170
,
PDF
Permissions

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome is a clinical condition characterized by atherosclerotic plaque rupture and thrombosis, requiring rapid diagnosis and intervention due to its high mortality. Non-invasive imaging methods like coronary computed tomography angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging have a critical role in its diagnosis and management. Proper modality selection by clinicians enhances diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease, echocardiography, myocardial perfusion imaging, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance imaging

References

1

Tokgözoğlu L, Kaya EB, Erol C, Ergene O; EUROASPIRE III Turkey Study Group. EUROASPIRE III: Türkiye ile Avrupa’nin karşilaştirilmasi [EUROASPIRE III: a comparison between Turkey and Europe]. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2010; 38: 164-72.

2

Timmis A, Vardas P, Townsend N, Torbica A, Katus H, De Smedt D, et al. European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021. Eur Heart J. 2022; 43: 716-99.

3

Kilic S, Aydın G, Çoner A, Doğan Y, Arican Özlük Ö, Çelik Y, et al. Prevalence and clinical profile of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries in Turkey (MINOCA-TR): a national multi-center, observational study. Anatol J Cardiol. 2020; 23: 176-82.

4

Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023; 44: 3720-826.

5

Kumar A, Cannon CP. Acute coronary syndromes: diagnosis and management, part I. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009; 84: 917-38.

6

Anderson JL, Morrow DA. Acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 2053-64.

7

Edvardsen T, Asch FM, Davidson B, Delgado V, DeMaria A, Dilsizian V, et al. Non-invasive imaging in coronary syndromes: recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022; 23: e6-33.

8

Townsend N, Nichols M, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe--epidemiological update 2015. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36: 2696-705.

9

Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthélémy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42: 1289-367.

10

Stankovic I, Putnikovic B, Cvjetan R, Milicevic P, Panic M, Kalezic-Radmili T, et al. Visual assessment vs. strain imaging for the detection of critical stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery in patients without a history of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 16: 402-9.

11

Grenne B, Eek C, Sjøli B, Dahlslett T, Uchto M, Hol PK, et al. Acute coronary occlusion in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: outcome and early identification by strain echocardiography. Heart. 2010; 96: 1550-6.

12

Smedsrud MK, Sarvari S, Haugaa KH, Gjesdal O, Ørn S, Aaberge L, et al. Duration of myocardial early systolic lengthening predicts the presence of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 1086-93.

13

Lin J, Gao L, He J, Liu M, Cai Y, Niu L, et al. Comparison of myocardial layer-specific strain and global myocardial work efficiency during treadmill exercise stress in detecting significant coronary artery disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 8: 786943.

14

Dedic A, Genders TS, Nieman K, Hunink MG. Imaging strategies for acute chest pain in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200: W26-38.

15

Linde JJ, Kelbæk H, Hansen TF, Sigvardsen PE, Torp-Pedersen C, Bech J, et al. Coronary CT angiography in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75: 453-63.

16

Kofoed KF, Kelbæk H, Hansen PR, Torp-Pedersen C, Høfsten D, Kløvgaard L, et al. Early versus standard care invasive examination and treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Circulation. 2018; 138: 2741-50.

17

Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, et al. The CT-STAT (coronary computed tomographic angiography for systematic triage of acute chest pain patients to treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 1414-22.

18

Dedic A, Lubbers MM, Schaap J, Lammers J, Lamfers EJ, Rensing BJ, et al. Coronary CT angiography for suspected acs in the era of high-sensitivity troponins: randomized multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 16-26.

19

Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, Chou ET, Woodard PK, Nagurney JT, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 299-308.

20

Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, Goodacre S, Oatey K, O’Brien R, et al. Early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021; 374: n2106.

21

MRG ve BT İnceleme Standartları. In: Türk Radyoloji Derneği, 2018.

22

Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Cury R, Earls JP, Mancini GJ, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014; 8: 342-58.

23

Halpern EJ. Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Radiology. 2009; 252: 332-45.

24

Burris AC 2 nd , Boura JA, Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM. Triple rule out versus coronary CT angiography in patients with acute chest pain: results from the ACIC consortium. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8: 817-25.

25

Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M, et al. CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 coronary artery disease-reporting and data system: an expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022; 16: 536-57.

26

Rybicki FJ, Udelson JE, Peacock WF, Goldhaber SZ, Isselbacher EM, Kazerooni E, et al. 2015 ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging in emergency department patients with chest pain: a joint document of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Committee and the American College of Cardiology appropriate use criteria task force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 853-79.

27

Fox K, Achenbach S, Bax J, Cosyns B, Delgado V, Dweck MR, et al. Multimodality imaging in cardiology: a statement on behalf of the Task Force on Multimodality Imaging of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40: 553-8.

28

Kawel-Boehm N, Hetzel SJ, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Captur G, Francois CJ, Herold MJ, et al. Reference ranges (“normal values”) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2020; 22: 87.

29

Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, Grosse-Wortmann L, He T, Kellman P, et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017; 19: 75.

30

Axel L, Toms MA. Clinical Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques. In: Kwong RY, Jerosch-Herold M, Heydari B, eds. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2019:17-50.

31

O’Brien AT, Gil KE, Varghese J, Simonetti OP, Zareba KM. T2 mapping in myocardial disease: a comprehensive review. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022; 24: 33.

32

Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG, Berry C, Escaned J, Maas AHEM, et al. An EAPCI expert consensus document on ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries in collaboration with european society of cardiology working group on coronary pathophysiology & microcirculation endorsed by coronary vasomotor disorders international study group. EuroIntervention. 2021; 16: 1049-69.

33

Yu S, Zhou J, Yang K, Chen X, Zheng Y, Zhao K, et al. Correlation of myocardial strain and late gadolinium enhancement by cardiac magnetic resonance after a first anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8: 705487.

34

Lai W, Jie H, Jian-Xun D, Ling-Cong K, Jun-Tong Z, Bo-Zhong S, et al. Impact of concomitant impairments of the left and right ventricular myocardial strain on the prognoses of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8: 659364.

35

Kawakami H, Nerlekar N, Haugaa KH, Edvardsen T, Marwick TH. Prediction of ventricular arrhythmias with left ventricular mechanical dispersion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020; 13: 562-72.

36

Vartdal T, Brunvand H, Pettersen E, Smith HJ, Lyseggen E, Helle-Valle T, et al. Early prediction of infarct size by strain Doppler echocardiography after coronary reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1715-21.

37

Wu KC. CMR of microvascular obstruction and hemorrhage in myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012; 14: 68.

38

Ørn S, Manhenke C, Greve OJ, Larsen AI, Bonarjee VV, Edvardsen T, et al. Microvascular obstruction is a major determinant of infarct healing and subsequent left ventricular remodelling following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30: 1978-85.

39

Kwan AC, Pourmorteza A, Stutman D, Bluemke DA, Lima JAC. Next-generation hardware advances in CT: cardiac applications. Radiology. 2021; 298: 3-17.

40

Yamada M, Yamada Y, Nakahara T, Okuda S, Abe T, Kuribayashi S, et al. Accuracy of ultra-high-resolution computed tomography with a 0.3-mm detector for quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis grading in comparison with conventional computed tomography: a phantom study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022; 16: 239-44.

41

Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Kondo S, Kawashita I, Takahashi I, Awai K. An introduction to photon-counting detector CT (PCD CT) for radiologists. Jpn J Radiol. 2023; 41: 266-82.

42

Si-Mohamed SA, Boccalini S, Lacombe H, Diaw A, Varasteh M, Rodesch PA, et al. Coronary CT angiography with photon-counting CT: first-in-human results. Radiology. 2022; 303: 303-13.

43

Yoshida K, Tanabe Y, Hosokawa T, Morikawa T, Fukuyama N, Kobayashi Y, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for clinical practice. Jpn J Radiol. 2024; 42: 555-80.

44

Han D, Lin A, Kuronuma K, Gransar H, Dey D, Friedman JD, et al. Cardiac computed tomography for quantification of myocardial extracellular volume fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023; 16: 1306-17.

45

Petrossian G, Ozdemir D, Galougahi KK, Scheiner J, Thomas SV, Shlofmitz R, et al. Role of intracoronary imaging in acute coronary syndromes. US Cardiol. 2022; 16: e15.

46

Lin A, Manral N, McElhinney P, Killekar A, Matsumoto H, Kwiecinski J, et al. Deep learning-enabled coronary CT angiography for plaque and stenosis quantification and cardiac risk prediction: an international multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health. 2022; 4: e256-65.

47

Griffin WF, Choi AD, Riess JS, Marques H, Chang HJ, Choi JH, et al. AI evaluation of stenosis on coronary CTA, comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve: a CREDENCE trial substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023; 16: 193-205.

48

Nagayama Y, Emoto T, Hayashi H, Kidoh M, Oda S, Nakaura T, et al. Coronary stent evaluation by CTA: image quality comparison between super-resolution deep learning reconstruction and other reconstruction algorithms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023; 221: 599-610.

49

Tanabe Y, Kurata A, Matsuda T, Yoshida K, Baruah D, Kido T, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Jpn J Radiol. 2020; 38: 411-33.

50

Driessen RS, Danad I, Stuijfzand WJ, Raijmakers PG, Schumacher SP, van Diemen PA, et al. Comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography, fractional flow reserve, and perfusion imaging for ischemia diagnosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 161-73.

51

Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, et al. Stress computed tomography perfusion versus fractional flow reserve ct derived in suspected coronary artery disease: the PERFECTION study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12: 1487-97.