Abstract
The goal of optimization in mammography is to perform the examination with the lowest radiation that will provide diagnostic images. While targeting a minimal radiation dose, care should be taken to ensure that the image quality is not lower than necessary. It is important to evaluate the radiation risk associated with mammography together with the potential benefits of early diagnosis and to consider the benefit-risk estimates. When patients opt out of necessary examinations due to perceived risks, they may unknowingly expose themselves to significant health consequences. Radiation risks from digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are considered small or negligible risks and the benefit-risk estimates are quite positive. Therefore, individuals should not avoid mammography screening within the specified age range and frequency.
Keywords: Mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, radiation protection, dosimetry
References
Kayhan A, Arıbal E. Meme kanseri taraması: neden yapıyoruz? ne zaman? değerlendirmede yaşanan sorunlar.Turk Radiol Semin.2014; 2: 230-40.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71: 209-49.
Parkin DM, Fernández LM. Use of statistics to assess the global burden of breast cancer.Breast J.2006; 12 (Suppl 1): S70-80.
Gelal F. Radyoloji fiziği. Dünya Kitabevi. 2023.
World Health Organization. Fact sheets: breast cancer. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
Çizmeli O, Arıbal E. Meme radyolojisi inceleme teknikleri. Ankara: Dünya Kitabevi; 2023.
Dance DR, Christofides S, Maidment ADA, McLean ID, Ng KH. Diagnostic radiology physics. A handbook for teachers and students.International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna.2014.
Worldwide implementation of digital mammography. IAEA Human Health Series No. 46.International Atomic Energy Agency.2023.
Duffy SW, Tabár L, Yen AM, Dean PB, Smith RA, Jonsson H, et al. Mammography screening reduces rates of advanced and fatal breast cancers: Results in 549,091 women.Cancer. 2020; 126: 2971-9.
de Gelder R, Heijnsdijk EA, Fracheboud J, Draisma G, de Koning HJ. The effects of population-based mammography screening starting between age 40 and 50 in the presence of adjuvant systemic therapy.Int J Cancer. 2015; 137: 165-72.
Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM, Havrilesky LJ, Grimm LJ, Ghate S, et al. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.JAMA. 2015; 314: 1615-34.
Tabár L, Dean PB, Chen TH, Yen AM, Chen SL, Fann JC, et al. The incidence of fatal breast cancer measures the increased effectiveness of therapy in women participating in mammography screening.Cancer. 2019; 125: 515-23.
Ozcinar B, Aribal E, Cabioglu N, Gurdal SO, Varol G, Akyurt N, et al. Long-term outcomes of Türkiye’s first population-based mammography screening program: a decade of breast cancer detection and survival analysis in Bahçeşehir.BMC Womens Health.2025; 25: 5.
Ahn S, Wooster M, Valente C, Moshier E, Meng R, Pisapati K, et al. Impact of screening mammography on treatment in women diagnosed with breast cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25: 2979-86.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards.International Atomic Energy Agency. 2014.
The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.Ann ICRP. 2007; 37: 1-332.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Quality assurance programme for digital mammography. IAEA human health series no. 17.International Atomic Energy Agency.2011.
Poggi C. Breast imaging techniques for radiographers.Springer Nature. 2022.
Seeram E. Dose optimization in digital radiography and computed tomography: an essential guide. First ed. Cham:Springer Nature; 2023.
Uniyal S. Patient radiation exposure monitoring in medical imaging (IAEA Safety Report Series No. 112).J Med Phys.2024; 49: 316-7.
Samei E, Järvinen H, Kortesniemi M, Simantirakis G, Goh C, Wallace A, et al. Medical imaging dose optimisation from ground up: expert opinion of an international summit.J Radiol Prot.2018; 38: 967-89.
ICRP PUBLICATION 154. Optimisation of radiological protection in digital radiology techniques for medical imaging.Ann ICRP. 2023; 52: 11-145.
Sechopoulos I. Mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: technique. Switzerland AG:Springer Nature; 2022; 1-24.
Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography.Radiology. 2005; 234: 353-62.
Samei E. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays.Radiographics. 2005; 25: 491-501.
Bushong SC. Radiologic science for technologists. 12th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2022.
Choudhary S. Deterministic and stochastic effects of radiation. Cancer Ther Oncol Int J. 2018; 12: 2.
Dance DR, Sechopoulos I. Dosimetry in X-ray-based breast imaging.Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61: R271-304.
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D’Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study.Radiology. 2008; 246: 434-43.
Sechopoulos I, Hendrick RE. Mammography and the risk of thyroid cancer.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: 705-7.
Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.Radiology. 2010; 257: 246-53.
Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and risks in breast screening.J Breast Imaging. ; 2: 188-200.
Di Maria S, van Nijnatten TJA, Jeukens CRLPN, Vedantham S, Dietzel M, Vaz P. Understanding the risk of ionizing radiation in breast imaging: Concepts and quantities, clinical importance, and future directions.Eur J Radiol. 2024; 181: 111784.
National Research Council of the National Academies. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, phase 2-committee to assess health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. Washington, DC:National Academies Press; 2006.
Miglioretti DL, Lange J, van den Broek JJ, Lee CI, van Ravesteyn NT, Ritley D, et al. Radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality from digital mammography screening: a modeling study.Ann Intern Med. 2016; 164: 205-14.
Yala A, Mikhael PG, Lehman C, Lin G, Strand F, Wan YL, et al. Optimizing risk-based breast cancer screening policies with reinforcement learning.Nat Med. 2022; 28: 136-43.
Di Maria S, Vedantham S, Vaz P. X-ray dosimetry in breast cancer screening: 2D and 3D mammography.Eur J Radiol. 2022; 151: 110278.
Di Maria S, Vedantham S, Vaz P. Breast dosimetry in alternative X-ray-based imaging modalities used in current clinical practices.Eur J Radiol.2022; 155: 110509.
Brown M, Covington MF. Comparative benefit-to-radiation risk ratio of molecular breast imaging, two-dimensional full-field digital mammography with and without tomosynthesis, and synthetic mammography with tomosynthesis.Radiol Imaging Cancer.2019; 1: e190005.
Svahn TM, Houssami N, Sechopoulos I, Mattsson S. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.Breast. 2015; 24: 93-9.
Fusco R, Raiano N, Raiano C, Maio F, Vallone P, Mattace Raso M, et al. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.Eur J Radiol.2020; 126: 108912.
Gennaro G, Cozzi A, Schiaffino S, Sardanelli F, Caumo F. Radiation Dose of dose of contrast-enhanced mammography: a two-center prospective comparison.Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14: 1774.
