Quality Control Application for Radiation Protection in Radiological Systems
PDF

Review

Quality Control Application for Radiation Protection in Radiological Systems

Turk Radiol Semin 2025;13(1):38-43 DOI: 10.4274/trs.2025.25196
PDF
Permissions

Abstract

The continuous and effective quality control evaluations of modalities used in radiology departments contribute to the diagnostic effectiveness of radiological images. The same processes are also necessary to reduce the ionizing radiation dose received by the patient. A medical physicist should play an active role in this process.

Keywords: Quality, control, test, medical physics expert

References

1

Delis H, Christaki K, Healy B, Loreti G, Poli GL, Toroi P, et al. Moving beyond quality control in diagnostic radiology and the role of the clinically qualified medical physicist.Phys Med. 2017; 41: 104-8.

2

International Atomic Energy Agency. Handbook of basic quality control tests for diagnostic radiology. IAEA Human Health Series No. 47, Vienna, 2023.

3

Hajebrahimi A, Aghlmand S, Hosseini SM, Behrouzlak T. Study of the status of access to the information and quality improvement in radiology department of the five teaching hospitals.Medical Sciences. 2018; 22: 364-71.

4

Diffey J. How many physicists does it take to test a mammography unit? Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2017; 40: 1-6.

5

Ireland T, Perdomo A, Lee KL, Jones A, Barnes P, Greig T, et al. ACPSEM position paper: recommendations for a digital general X-ray quality assurance program.Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024; 47: 789-812.

6

Gam NP, Sibiya MN. Doctors’ perspectives on the quality of medical imaging in public hospitals in eThekwini District.Health SA. 2024; 29: 2389.

7

Surić Mihić M, Mestrović T, Prlić I, Surić D. Importance of quality assurance program implementation in conventional diagnostic radiology.Coll Antropol. 2008; 32 (Suppl 2): 181-4.

8

Qenam BA, Li T, Tapia K, Brennan PC. The roles of clinical audit and test sets in promoting the quality of breast screening: a scoping review.Clin Radiol.2020; 75: 794.e1-6.

9

Yurt A, Cavuşoğlu B, Günay T. Evaluation of awareness on radiation protection and knowledge about radiological examinations in healthcare professionals who use ionized radiation at work.Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2014; 23: 48-53.

10

Vodovatov AV, Balonov MI, Golikov VY, Shatsky IG, Chipiga LA, Bernhardsson C. Proposals for the establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for radiography for adult patients based on regional dose surveys in Russıan federation.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017; 173: 223-32.

11

Delgado AB, Rasmussen K, Jr ZS, Stathakis S, Papanikolaou N, Gutierrez A, et al . The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to score plan quality of intact prostate treatment plans.International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2018; 3: e534.

12

Hamzian N, Asadian S, Zarghani H. A study of radiation protection standards compliance in hospital radiographic departments in Iran.J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022; 12: 513-20.

13

Gibson DJ, Davidson RA. Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study.Acad Radiol. 2012; 19: 458-62.

14

Radyoloji Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği, 31821 sayılı 26.4.2022 tarihli Resmî Gazete’de.

15

Türkiye İlaç ve Tıbbî Cihaz Kurumunun yayınladığı “Diagnostik Radyoloji, Nükleer Tıp ve Radyoterapi Grubu Tıbbi Cihazların Kalite Uygunluk ve Kalite Kontrol Testleri Hakkında Yönetmelikte Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik”, 20.12.2023 ve 32405 Sayılı Resmi Gazete’de.

16

Diagnostik radyoloji, nükleer tıp ve radyoterapi grubu tıbbi cihazların kalite uygunluk ve kalite kontrol testleri hakkında yönetmelik hükümlerinin uygulanmasına ilişkin kılavuz. TCS-KLVZ-06. Türkiye İlaç ve Tıbbi Cihaz Kurumu. 2022.

17

International Atomic Energy Agency. Medical physics staffing needs in diagnostic imaging and radionuclide therapy: an activity based approach. IAEA Human Health Reports No. 15, Vienna, 2023.

18

Morozov S, Guseva E, Ledikhova N, Vladzymyrskyy A, Safronov D. Telemedicine-based system for quality management and peer review in radiology.Insights Imaging. 2018; 9: 337-41.

19

Looney P, Halling-Brown MD, Oduko JM, Young KC. A pilot study on the development of remote quality control of digital mammography systems in the NHS breast screening programme.J Digit Imaging.2015; 28: 586-93.

20

Mora P, Pfeiffer D, Zhang G, Bosmans H, Delis H, Razi Z, et al. The IAEA remote and automated quality control methodology for radiography and mammography.J Appl Clin Med Phys.2021; 22: 126-42.

21

Larson DB, Boland GW. Imaging quality control in the era of artificial intelligence.J Am Coll Radiol.2019; 16: 1259-66.

22

Andersen ER, Jorde J, Taoussi N, Yaqoob SH, Konst B, Seierstad T. Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.Acta Radiol.2012; 53: 174-8.

23

Samara ET, Fitousi N, Bosmans H. Quality assurance of dose management systems.Phys Med. 2022; 99: 10-5.

24

Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. Sağlıkta Kalite, Akreditasyon ve Çalışan Hakları Daire Başkanlığı. SKS Hastane (Sürüm 6).